Strategy & Governance

Managed Security

Cyber Defense

Governance, Risk & Compliance

Operations & People

Talk to us

Operations & People

Cybersecurity staff augmentation, under your direction.

Cybersecurity staff augmentation in India solves a timing problem more than a cost one. The audit is in eight weeks, the certification programme needs a full-time pair of hands for four months, an analyst has resigned mid-quarter, and the recruitment cycle for a competent security professional is longer than the window you have.

Augmentation places vetted professionals into your team, working under your direction, your processes and your reporting line. That is the distinction from outsourcing, where a vendor takes ownership of an outcome. Here you keep ownership; you gain capacity and a specific skill you do not currently have.

You interview and approve every person before they start. Engagements run from a few weeks of surge support through to long-term embedded roles, on site, remote or hybrid. Where the gap is leadership rather than delivery, a virtual CISO is the right shape instead.

Why you need it

01 / 06

Why teams augment.

01

Recruitment is slower than the deadline.

Sourcing, interviewing, negotiating and serving a notice period for an experienced security professional routinely takes three to five months. An audit date, a certification deadline or a customer commitment rarely waits that long.

02

The need is specific and temporary.

A certification programme, a cloud migration, a merger integration or an incident creates months of concentrated demand for a skill you will not need permanently. Hiring for it leaves you overstaffed afterwards; not covering it leaves the project late.

03

Small teams have no depth.

A three-person security function loses a third of its capacity when one person takes leave, resigns or is consumed by an incident. Augmentation provides cover without a permanent headcount decision.

04

Some skills do not justify a full-time role.

Cloud security engineering, application security, forensics or ISO 27001:2022 implementation are each needed intensely and then intermittently. Buying them by the month is more honest than hiring a generalist and hoping.

Instrument

02 / 06

Where the gap actually is.

Ten questions give an indicative posture and a gap list, which is usually a better guide to the role you need than a job description written last year.

What we deliver

03 / 06

Roles we place.

01

Security analysts

Monitoring, triage and response across your SIEM and security tooling: covering a shift, filling a vacancy, or adding capacity during a period of elevated activity. Working your queue, your playbooks and your escalation path.

02

Penetration testers

Offensive security specialists for VAPT, red team and application testing engagements: web, mobile, API, cloud, network and Active Directory. Useful where you have a testing programme and not enough hands to run it.

03

GRC and compliance specialists

Hands-on support for ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR and DPDP Act programmes: risk assessment, control implementation, evidence collection, policy work and audit preparation. The most commonly requested role, because compliance work is intense and finite.

04

Security engineers and architects

Designing, implementing and maintaining security architecture and tooling: SIEM deployment and tuning, endpoint platforms, identity infrastructure, network security and the integration work that makes a purchased tool actually function.

05

Incident responders

On-demand responders for investigation, containment and recovery, augmenting your team during an active incident, or providing forensic capability you do not hold in house.

06

Cloud and DevSecOps engineers

Securing CI/CD pipelines, cloud infrastructure and container environments: infrastructure-as-code security, pipeline controls, Kubernetes hardening and cloud posture management, working inside your engineering team rather than alongside it.

How we run it

04 / 06

Six steps to someone starting.

  1. 01

    Requirement assessment

    Scope, skills, seniority, duration, working model and team structure. We are candid where the requirement is unrealistic: a single person who is expert in cloud security, forensics and ISO 27001 auditing does not exist at the rate anyone wants to pay.

    Days 1-3
  2. 02

    Talent shortlisting

    Matched candidates from our vetted pool, presented with real profiles: verified experience, certifications held, and an honest assessment of where they are strong and where they are still developing.

    Days 3-7
  3. 03

    Interview and selection

    You interview and approve every candidate. Nobody joins your team without your agreement, and technical and cultural fit are both your call. We do not present a substitution as a fait accompli.

    Week 2
  4. 04

    Onboarding

    Integration into your tools, workflows, reporting lines and security requirements, with background verification and confidentiality agreements completed before access is granted.

    Weeks 2-3
  5. 05

    Performance management

    Regular check-ins with you and with the individual, so that a mismatch surfaces in week three rather than month four. Where a placement is not working, we replace it rather than defend it.

    Ongoing
  6. 06

    Flexible scaling

    Scale up during an audit, an incident or a major project, and scale down when demand eases, without the fixed commitment of permanent headcount.

    As needs change

Key benefits

05 / 06

What changes after.

The deadline becomes achievable

Onboarding in weeks rather than months means the audit date, the certification timeline or the customer commitment stops depending on a recruitment cycle you do not control.

You keep control

Augmented staff work under your direction, in your processes, reporting to your managers. You gain capacity without handing over ownership of the outcome.

Capacity matches demand

Scale up for the intense period and down afterwards, instead of carrying a permanent cost for a temporary need or under-resourcing a critical window.

Tools we use

06 / 06

Named, and used on your engagement.

No “latest tech tools”. These are the ones your report will cite, alongside the manual work that a tool cannot do for you.

Certifications held across the pool

  • CEH
  • OSCP
  • CISSP
  • CISA

Analyst and SOC skills

  • Microsoft Sentinel
  • Elastic Security
  • Wazuh
  • Splunk
  • MITRE ATT&CK

Offensive security skills

  • Burp Suite Professional
  • BloodHound
  • Metasploit Framework
  • Nessus

GRC skills

  • ISO 27001:2022
  • SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria
  • GDPR
  • DPDP Act, 2023
  • HIPAA

Cloud and DevSecOps skills

  • AWS
  • Azure
  • GCP
  • Kubernetes
  • Terraform
  • Trivy
  • Semgrep

Why Aphelion

Shared

Four things you can check.

01

The work is done by people with names.

Darshap Nayak, formerly of KPMG, holds a master’s degree in cybersecurity and more than seven years in security operations. Jaimin Somani brings fifteen-plus years of academic and hands-on VAPT. Hemang Desai is an ICT network specialist from Australia. You will meet them, not a logo.

Meet the team
02

Evidence, not adjectives.

Every finding arrives with the reproduction steps, the affected asset and the fix, ranked by what it actually reaches in your environment, not by a CVSS number copied from a scanner. You get the report and the raw output, not a summary of a summary.

See how we test
03

Two offices, one practice.

Ahmedabad and Sharjah, working the same methodology on the same tooling. Indian data-residency requirements and UAE delivery are both ordinary here, and the AphelioNYX AD Pen-Test module runs entirely inside your perimeter when regulation says it must.

The platform
04

What we will not do.

Invent a statistic to make a slide land. Publish your name as a client without written permission. Print an award badge nobody awarded. Founded in 2024. We say so, and we attribute experience to the people who have it.

Ask us anything

100+ organizations secured

Across the globe, and across eight industries. We name a client only with their written permission.

  • Finance & Banking
  • Healthcare
  • Retail & E-commerce
  • Technology
  • SaaS
  • Hospitality
  • Manufacturing
  • Pharmaceuticals

AphelioNYX is SOC 2, ISO and GDPR compliant; attestations are available on request under NDA. We would rather hand you the report than print a badge.

Questions

FAQ

What clients ask about staff augmentation.

How is this different from outsourcing?
Ownership. With augmentation, the professional works as an extension of your team, under your direction, following your processes and reporting into your management line. You own the outcome and they add capacity. With outsourcing, a vendor takes ownership of a defined outcome and manages the people delivering it. Both are legitimate; the choice depends on whether you want capacity or a result. Our managed SOC is the outsourced model.
How quickly can someone start?
Most engagements are staffed within one to two weeks of requirements being finalised, and common roles (analysts, GRC specialists) can move faster. Highly specialised requirements take longer, and we say so at the outset rather than presenting a near-match. Background verification and your own access provisioning usually add a few days on top.
Do we choose the person?
Yes, always. You interview and approve every candidate before onboarding, on both technical and cultural fit, and you can decline as many as you need to. We would rather present a third shortlist than place someone who is not right, because a poor placement costs you more in ramp-up and management time than the delay would have.
On site, remote or hybrid?
All three, chosen to fit your operational requirements. Remote works well for GRC, testing and engineering work and gives access to a wider talent pool. On site matters where physical presence is required, where the work involves sensitive environments, or where integration into a team needs face-to-face time early. Hybrid (on site for onboarding and key periods, remote otherwise) is the most common arrangement.
What if the person is not working out?
Tell us early and we replace them. Regular check-ins with both you and the individual exist so a mismatch surfaces in the first few weeks rather than at the end of a quarter, and the engagement terms provide for replacement without penalty. It is rare, and when it happens it is usually a scope mismatch rather than a capability problem, which is a signal to revisit the requirement as well as the person.

Forty-five minutes. Your environment, not a slide deck.

A personalised walkthrough and a free readiness assessment against the frameworks you are actually being asked for. Pick a time that suits you, or write to us. We reply within one business day.